Naturalistic fallacy. My view and answers.
'What' is more important than 'Where'. Being able to see what really lies in front of you is much more important than where you think you are.
- A thought I've just come across. The topic being, our behaviour in relation to growth and survival of humans and how we are changing and how its effecting the planet.
For tens of thousands of years, hunter gatherer tribes have lived on this earth. In small congrugations all over each island. Where we kill what we need.
There has been per human role, more hunter garther humans on the planet than there has been farmers.
And due to many reasons, Human society grew in many ways.
Populations increased, food need, increased. And tribes/socieities/communities/groups/citiies/population in general grew it size. - Along with Technology.
All this improvement happened in many different ways. From natural selection, to Rome, introducing new methods to new conqucered city states/countries.
Farming and cultivation and mass production were introduced to cater for human needs. But by taking such design routes for said needs, we are building a structure that is inevitability going to burn.
This poses an interesting thought. Will we have enough resources for ourselves in 5000 years?
Because clearly - At a hunter gatherer level, we were living in perfect unison with our resourcse.
But clearly we arn't now. And our needs and requirements are growing at an infanitabable rate.
So what I maybe saying - IS that - the only time we were safe as a race was when we were classed as - Hunter Gatherers. And since then its all just been a downward spiral of growth.
Another way of putting it is -
Nomads were around thousands of years longer than farmers,
with no impact on nature. Yet look at the impact of the farmers and mass
production today and Work it out for yourself.
Uncontrollable growth is only one of the factors that will
end in the human’s downfall. You could also argue that humans increase in knowledge
is as well, the way we are designed to improve and learn and how we can correlate
and understand a more advanced way to anything else appears positive. But is it
really? I feel increase is inevitable now, maybe it always has been? And this
increase will end badly. Like all increases.
Meaning that, If nomads can live off the land for 1000's of years with no impact, why are farmers and mass production doing so horrfically bad at everything. We know its because of the growing population. But back at Nomad level we were perfect.
No creature has a brain as well developed as ours. But we have let our brains go out of control and not taken action against the problems that have occurred. Mass population and over compensating or the 'god effect' for everything has seriously effecting the humans chances of long term survival. Can you picture humans being able to survive off the earths resources in 5000 years? No chance!
*
I'm not predicting the future, I am explaining the past in a more clearer manner. Which will then
by its own accord, tell the future, if circumstances stay the same. Which, knowing the human race,
they will.
And not only that but, because of our own, overwhelmingly high success in relation to
populational growth and technical ability. We have in many senses, permanently weakened ourselves
as overall humans.
Because, - Can you see the girl down the road, surviving in a terrain that is dormant and empty
of human existence. Can you see the businessman in town, surviving such situations? With nothing?
As a whole, Humans have become, less healthy, weaker in the sense of how to survive in bare
natural areas, like they used too. And their immune systems have become drastically weaker in manner senses.
And currently, I think this is all down to uncontrolled growth.
Many of these issues can be easily thwarted by the individual. But in relation the species as a Whole I feel that, awareness is scarce and that the race is disabling itself in an unrepairable manner.
If you have something that's increasing at a rate that is close to uncontrollable in an environment where the surrounding variables are fixed the increase will break at some point.
Tangent Subject below.
- I also feel a google education is quite important, if you look around correctly, I feel the internet is slowly housing many books(soon all?:D) and if you know where to look, you can find relevant high quality information in only 30 or less clicks or whatever which is better than reading 600pages till you reach important areas. Well it works for me, but I won't leave books I guess haha. But importantly and this is the area I want to cover was- I feel the most important means of education in life is this simple linear sentence. Event/(step)action/experience/widsom. I am integrating to live by that more recently. In a more constant way than usual I mean. I think its closely link to trial and error, but... I'm not trailing to try and succeed at something, or am I? I am aiming to increase wisdom and that's it, so maybe it is trial and error lol. For example, a simple one would be. You go on a date, then say by, and your posed with, do you ring her? And of course you do! But we will apply the linear sentence. Event is date, you then take the step(always!) Which is the action to call her the next morning or whatever, you then gain the expierence from it and therefor rare wisdom. I feel wisdom is the most important quality to gain in life, so I'm aiming for that more than anything now. And also, if she's nice and wise, she will understand you took the step to call her, and appreciate that. And if she's not nice, then you'll probably realize that soon if you havnt already lol! Either way wisdom is gained from this example lol good example tho! Always take that first step! Always! Not for the obvious advantage but for the hidden gain, the wisdom!
Questions Posed (Training Exercise in Philosophy)
What is 'Love'?
Love is only a word, what is more important, is the connection the word implies. What is affection, if not love? We see animals showing affection, so love is more than just a human emotion.
In the future, machines may love. If they feel a connection, that is the main importantance.
female lion runs in after baby, out of love? Runs even though out numbered. Survival?
Instint?
But what is instint? a chmeical feeling from memorie connected to a recent coonection of importance?
a sub concious action over your feelings of assets that are relative to your survival?
If a connection is present, anything can love. Female lions and others have been seen to
run after their baby cubs if taken by other animails, even though the female is again against odds that
would easily extingiuish them. Do you see this as stupidity? Love? A connection? Instint?
But what is instint? If not a chemical feeling derived from memory that has a recent/long term connection
to something of value to them? Maybe it's action that is taken sub consciously relative to your survival?
What is 'Real'
-
I believe the Transition into Veganism is unnatural.
...
No comments:
Post a Comment